Skip to content

Conversation

@cfereday
Copy link

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade fastq from 1.19.1 to 1.20.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: fastq from fastq GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade fastq from 1.19.1 to 1.20.1.

See this package in npm:
fastq

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/runtime-3by/project/3af2d020-78e9-4846-9064-bd2167f7613f?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@cfereday cfereday requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2026 10:40
@cfereday cfereday requested a review from dan-arpino January 13, 2026 10:40
@snyk-pr-review-bot
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected
📚 Repository Context Analyzed

This review considered 13 relevant code sections from 2 files (average relevance: 0.90)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ dan-arpino
❌ snyk-bot
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@snyk-pr-review-bot
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected
📚 Repository Context Analyzed

This review considered 13 relevant code sections from 2 files (average relevance: 0.90)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants